If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. While what is a safe distance from a cell tower but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. what is safe distance from 5g tower is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the farther your location from the tower.
While this sounds like a good idea however, people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those living further away from the antennas.
This study found that people who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ in the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the consequences on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.