Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting.  Extra resources  look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

what is a safe distance from a cell tower  are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.


The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further the tower is.

While it sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were distance from them.

However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.

This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research.  what is safe distance from 5g tower  include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This also overlooks the greater penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the effect of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.